Journal Home
Search for

Volume 6, Issue 8, Pages 2960-2969 (August 2010)


View previous. 12 of 57 View next.

Synergistic effects of electrospun PLLA fiber dimension and pattern on neonatal mouse cerebellum C17.2 stem cells

Liumin HeabCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Susan Liaoac, Daping Quanb, Kun Maa, Casey Chana, S. Ramakrishnaac, Jiang Lub

Received 3 November 2009; received in revised form 23 February 2010; accepted 23 February 2010. published online 02 March 2010.

Abstract 

Topographical features, including fiber dimensions and pattern, are important aspects in developing fibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering. In this study aligned poly(l-lactide) (PLLA) fibers with diameters of 307±47, 500±53, 679±72 and 917±84nm and random fibers with diameters of 327±40, 545±54, 746±82 and 1150±109nm were obtained by optimizing the electrospinning parameters. We cultured neonatal mouse cerebellum C17.2 cells on the PLLA fibers. These neural stem cells (NSCs) exhibited significantly different growth and differentiation depending upon fiber dimension and pattern. On aligned fibers cell viability and proliferation was best on 500nm fibers, and reduced on smaller or larger fibers. However, on random fibers cell viability and proliferation was best with the smallest (350nm) and largest (1150nm) diameter fibers. Polarized and elongated cells were orientated along the fiber direction on the aligned fibers, with focal contacts bridging the cell body and aligned fibers. Cells of spindle and polygonal morphologies were randomly distributed on the random fibers, with no focal contacts observed. Moreover, longer neurites were obtained on the aligned fibers than random fibers within the same diameter range. Thus, the surface topographic morphologies of fibrous scaffolds, including fiber pattern, dimensions and mesh size, play roles in regulating the viability, proliferation and neurite outgrowth of NSCs. Nevertheless, our results indicated that aligned 500nm fiber are most promising for fine tuning the design of a nerve scaffold.

a Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Initiative, Division of Bioengineering, National University of Singapore, 9 Engineering Drive 1, Singapore 117576, Singapore

b Institute of Polymer Science, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China

c Department of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore, 9 Engineering Drive 1, Singapore 117576, Singapore

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Present address: Institutes of Life and Health Engineering, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China. Tel.: +86 65 65163346; fax: +86 65 67730339.

PII: S1742-7061(10)00113-3

doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2010.02.039


View previous. 12 of 57 View next.